Alternet

NY Times

Slate

Salon

Truthout

Women's Enews

alas, a blog

blogsheroes

BoingBoing

Feministing

Pandagon

UN Dispatch

WIMN's Voices

CodePink

Global Exchange

Int'l Gender & Trade Network

MisFortune500

Treehugger

WEDO

Worldchanging

Younger Women's Task Force

ArtsJournal

Feminist Art Project

Guernica

PopMatters

Rhizome

Words Without Borders

Add to Technorati Favorites

My Photo
Name:
Location: United States

tktktk.

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from ma neeks. Make your own badge here.

Powered by Blogger

30 May 2006

Chivalry: Good for sexual connections

Usually I wouldn't give bad writing/reportage this kind of play, but this is too great to pass up. Laura Berman, a couples therapist in Chicago and frequent contributor to the Chicago Sun-Times, warns us of a frightening epidemic:
We get offered a seat or have a door politely opened for us and -- watch out! -- we say no thank you, I am as strong and capable as you are. Though as women we don't want to be patronized, saying no to chivalry may have some unintended effects on our personal lives.
Eek gads! Oh, Dr. Berman, pray tell. What grave consequences would befall me if I held the door? It all becomes so clear in the last sentence . . .
The problem we never saw coming is that equal power and equal everything has a way of diminishing our sexual connection with each other.
Bam! El fin. And if you can't clearly see how challenging chivalry decreases sexual connection between heterosexual couples (oh, you didn't think she'd ever address anything less, did you?) then you're just insane. Downright dense. Go read something vile to satiate your feminine ineptitude, you freakish manhater.

Comments on "Chivalry: Good for sexual connections"

 

post a comment