That insanely invasive legislation, the Patriot Act, was swiftly renewed by the House and Senate last night in a 257-171 vote. The passage was prompted by the recent London bombings and U.S. fears of impending terrorist attacks in the States.
House Republicans pointed to the attacks in London yesterday and on July 7 as evidence of the need to reauthorize the Patriot Act with relatively few modifications. While the law has "helped avert additional attacks on our soil, the threat has not abated," Sensenbrenner said. (Washington Post) The ratification made permanent virtually all of the provisions in the law, with the exception of two, which will have to be re-considered by Congress in ten years.
The remaining two provisions - giving the government the power to demand business and library records and to conduct roving wiretaps - would have to be reconsidered by Congress in 10 years. (NYTimes) Oh, well I mean, what's ten years really? At the rate we're going, we'll have obliterated ourselves long before then.
|
Comments on "Patriot Act renewed under banner of fear"
The thing that really gets to me is the protection of "personal" documents writen by John Roberts, these "personal" documents are memos on cases which might (and because they are being protected) probably do reveal important information on how Roberts personally feels about certain legislation and court rulings.
The current government has become hyper-protective of it's own writing even as it is becoming hyper-watchful of what others write.
To me this clearly signals that the current government is aware of what others might behinding since it in turn is hiding so much. Just a thought.
I don't think I could have put it better myself. In fact, maybe I'll post your comment as an entry.