Alternet

NY Times

Slate

Salon

Truthout

Women's Enews

alas, a blog

blogsheroes

BoingBoing

Feministing

Pandagon

UN Dispatch

WIMN's Voices

CodePink

Global Exchange

Int'l Gender & Trade Network

MisFortune500

Treehugger

WEDO

Worldchanging

Younger Women's Task Force

ArtsJournal

Feminist Art Project

Guernica

PopMatters

Rhizome

Words Without Borders

Add to Technorati Favorites

My Photo
Name:
Location: United States

tktktk.

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from ma neeks. Make your own badge here.

Powered by Blogger

30 January 2006

More ineffective AIDS funding

Bush has developed a $15 million AIDS funding program. Guess who's likely to see most of the money?
Groups that have deep local ties in the countries and focus on abstinence and fidelity --instead of just condoms--are faring well.
Now that's what I call smart: more faith-based organizations who see Jesus and abstinence as the most effective means to combat a global pandemic. Gee, that'll work well considering that abstinence is not an option for women if they are raped or subject to sexual violence, family and social pressure, or economic needs. And fidelity is based on honesty and well, call me slutty, but it seems a little shaky to center your global crisis solutions on an often tenuous agreement of trust.

Seems to me that the "brains" behind the ABCs (Abstinence, Be Faithful, Condoms) prevention method just aren't really using their noodles when it comes to thinking about the people living daily in countries ravaged by economic insecurity, inequitable social norms, conflict, limited or no healthcare, and violence.

Learn more about the HIV/AIDS crisis and how women are particularly vulnerable to infection.

*Sorry. Bono moment over.*

Comments on "More ineffective AIDS funding"

 

post a comment